Madden Girl Lifft Sandal
Madden Girl Lifft Sandal is rated out of 5 by 11.
Rated 1 out of 5 by Anonymous from Cute, but painful!Super cute, but mercy they are "hard". Every edge digs into my feet, toes, ankle, etc. I'm an 8.5 narrow to medium width, so it's not like I have wide feet that cause these shoes to rub. Also, there isn't any kind of rubber sole. I definitely do not mind my heels making a little racket when I walk...that's part of the fun of wearing heels. I am a high school teacher and no lie, the one and only time that I wore these shoes, I sounded like a horse clomping down the hall.
Date published: 2020-09-30
Rated 5 out of 5 by Anonymous from Perfect style!Light weight!! I LOVE these shoes! Exactly what I’ve been looking for & a GREAT price!!
Date published: 2020-09-28
Rated 4 out of 5 by Anonymous from CuteSupper light weigh, great heal with ouch pinching your toes, however, the way the leather is stitched and cut is rough and scratches throughout the day.
Date published: 2020-09-16
Rated 4 out of 5 by Shopaholic Emm from Sexy and painlessssThe major selling point for these shoes is that the heel IS NOT HEAVY AT ALLLLL. The lightweight platform makes it easier to walk omg and it doesn’t blister you ankle at all. Shoes will still blister your toes but after HOURS not like immediately hitting the pavement. I’ve purchased all other colors of this super as well. I recommend.
Date published: 2020-09-07
Rated 5 out of 5 by L1Jones from Madden girlNice shoe to wear very comfortable on my feet and they where a good price .
Date published: 2020-07-05
Rated 2 out of 5 by Danielle8787 from Cheap qualityFeel very cheap - the leather strap that goes into the buckle is already being cut by the buckle after wearing once.
Date published: 2020-06-03
Rated 5 out of 5 by Lizett from Madden Girl Lifft SandalThese shoes are super light. The heel is a perfect height. I'm very happy with this purchase.
Date published: 2020-04-21
Rated 3 out of 5 by LouiseM from Cute but cheapCheap feeling leather, very light though. I expected more, but for $50 not bad quality
Date published: 2020-03-11